putin/obama

Like it or not, it defines how our society is

Postforever »

By the way it was interesting to note in the material that Ra knew exactly where Genghis khan was when asked.

Not only the location, but the job he was doing in 4d neg (shipping clerk). It seems they consider this type of monitoring important or at least easy to do.
forever
 

Postforever »

those may be closer to each other than you think.



I know...
-------------------


Its almost at times like those 'positive' people that think that positiveness is always smiling and hugging everybody or that sort of style. Well then on the 'negative' side you have those that think that being negative is always trying to do a bloody mess...
forever
 

Postunity100 »

forever wrote:
those may be closer to each other than you think.


I know...
-------------------
Here another example this from a former head of state:

http://thehill.com/policy/international ... ating-isis


you dont need to go as far as castro about it. its not like mccain is denying or hiding anything.

bluenationreview.com/john-mccain-circa-2013-arm-isis/

forever wrote:By the way it was interesting to note in the material that Ra knew exactly where Genghis khan was when asked.

Not only the location, but the job he was doing in 4d neg (shipping clerk). It seems they consider this type of monitoring important or at least easy to do.


its easy to reach any potential state of parallel existences of this universe when you are nearing 7d from 6.

forever wrote:
those may be closer to each other than you think.



I know...
-------------------


Its almost at times like those 'positive' people that think that positiveness is always smiling and hugging everybody or that sort of style. Well then on the 'negative' side you have those that think that being negative is always trying to do a bloody mess...


the perception of especially angloamericans seem to be shaped by their culture. positive has a different meaning in their culture, its a word used for something basically different than the polarity of positivity. hence they are confusing them a lot.
unity100
 

Postforever »

the perception of especially angloamericans seem to be shaped by their culture. positive has a different meaning in their culture, its a word used for something basically different than the polarity of positivity. hence they are confusing them a lot.


Very well. We are now dealing with the basis of the present octave. The crux of the matter. Once in 3rd density, the entity has a choice: a polarity of being negative (service to self) vs a polarity of being positive (service to others) ---(or neither them needing more reincarnations to advance until a choice is made). Here the statue is beginning to take shape --forged in fire...to be developed in latter densities.

Maybe in very simple terms to have a background..............:

A planet then when 4th density is reached, reaches a conscious state due to the 4d entities (now forming a social memory complex -SMC) and then it becomes a negative or a positive planet --well this happens actually before and much earlier in time-space. In the case of earth, it became (already, believe it or not) a positive planet. working in harmony with the SMC that has been reincarnating in the planet. Now a SMC formation is a question of short-medium time span (50 to 650 years or so) for Earth itself.

Before anything, (another crucial aspect in this octave): once a negative entity/SMC reaches 6D, in order to advance further, the negative polarity must be abandoned if a negative path was followed.

-----------------
Now, can you define what (leaving aside cultural differences to the major extent) makes an entity positive ?
What makes an entity negative ?
What makes an entity none of those ('lukewarm') ?
forever
 

Postunity100 »

forever wrote:In the case of earth, it became (already, believe it or not) a positive planet.


that may not be so. the planet may have become a positive 4d planet due to being on that path, and therefore moving towards that direction. however it may not mean that smc is already there.

a smc is not a simple affair. it basically is a union in which entities share thoughts and memories. tho there are signs that this is beginning, it may be too early to say that it is a smc yet.

forever wrote:Now, can you define what (leaving aside cultural differences to the major extent) makes an entity positive ?


complex definition, however the strongest identifier is the entity's spirit complex and its bias. everything seems secondary to that. even cultural environment. culture is chosen more because it is in accordance with spirit's bias and entity's overall experience than anything else.

What makes an entity negative ?


http://www.lawofone.info/results.php?s=19#17

mostly spiritual bias, i'd say. the strongest of all biases.

What makes an entity none of those ('lukewarm') ?


not having a sharpened and defined spiritual bias.
unity100
 

Postforever »

that may not be so. the planet may have become a positive 4d planet due to being on that path, and therefore moving towards that direction. however it may not mean that smc is already there.


Not it is not formed yet. It is in the way judging by BRICS coalition, for example. Regarding Europe, victory of Syriza in Greece and possibly in Spain could make great advances towards constructing the road.

Hopefully, BRICS and others will protect/nurture these developments as a mother/father takes care of their newborn child.
forever
 

Previous

Return to Politics

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 0 guests