Quick summary of the rays

Putting things into practice. Methods, tips, tricks for applying spirituality into everyday life

Postforever »

Basic starting point and overview of the rays/energy centers started via an email interchange with unity and here his response. I included some other comments by me within '===='.
I guess wee need to keep adding and clarifying these concepts.
---------------------------
RED RAY:
motion and change



ORANGE RAY:
self needs and progress


YELLOW RAY:
self awarenes and awareness of others


GREEN RAY:
love and acceptance of others and emotions

=========
the emotions concept seem very general... I guess is the base for the only emotion the balanced entity has: love.
However, emotions are very tied to particular rays, i.e.: anger to red ray, for example.
=========


BLUE RAY:
communication and understanding of existence/universe

=======
however, is the expression of anger a property of blue ray and the seated emotion of anger a property of red ray......?
Is a dog barking in anger a property of blue ray in that entity ?
Is an angry person yelling at another a property of blue ray in that 3rd density entity ? Or all these manifestations are exclusive property of red ray ?

=======


INDIGO RAY:

understanding and manifestations of unity and self worth. Co-creation, balance, unification.



VIOLET RAY:
Balance of all the rays (and also intelligent infinity equivalent)

this is hard to tell yet. it may be keeping balance in the face of
endless change, but it can also be seeing change as a different kind
of balance happening every given moment and changing and flowing with
the change.
forever
 

Postunity100 »

there are two facets to every density as far as i can see.

one is, the activity that is manifested in that density. which was learned in previous density. it is the basis of that given density.

for example entities who learn to, (and want to do) 'motion without random dissolution and with direction' go to 2nd density - orange.

this is the basis of this density.

it was learned in 1st density - red. entities in 1st density do not move by themselves. they are moved by natural forces - wind, fire, water. their movements. they are changed, shaped, broken and transformed by these forces. of course, 2nd density entities also play a factor too.

so the entity which has learned full spectrum of 'movement and change' in 1st density, and wanting to 'move with direction, intention and without dissolution', go into 2nd density.

here, they manifest moving without dissolution, with intent and direction.

then there is the lesson of 2nd density - concept of self (now a focus which has its own shape and format, and changes without dissolving randomly, and changes with its own intent), and its progress. its needs, its desires and its situations.

cycle goes ever the same. 3rd density is the density of entities which have learned the lesson of 2nd density - of moving without dissolution, transforming and developing. They graduate into the new concept of 'there are other selves than me' into 3rd density. where they manifest already known 2d knowledge, and learn the 3d lesson : 'me and the world outside and our interactions'.

so it goes for every density.
unity100
 

Postforever »

Then the other facet are the energy centers manifested within each entity. Is this what you are referring to as the other facet ?

I am referring in this case to the properties of the rays not in a density-sense but in an entity-sense. And I am not referring to the activated ray obviously since that represents ray/light property to that density. I rather would like to explore at this point, the rays as they relate to an entity, not to the the density per se, although all this is intimately related, of course.

So, lets put again the emotion anger: per the material, it is a property of red ray, at least in a 3rd density being with the current archetypical mind of this sub-logos --since we are limited to this sub-logos in many senses --and this will require another topic... But, is it because it prevents 'motion and change' ? ---properties of 1st density. The energy center is 'blocked' not allowing 'motion and change' to occur. Seems so, since if one is in an anger state, there is no room for anything else. For the energy to flow and allow other types of flowing to occur, for the mind to further manifest.

But then, is it venting this anger allowing the flow as blue ray expression or is it just an expression of the (always partial) blockage of the red center, using blue just a property of the density aspect, not the 'holographic nature' of the true blue ray in the entity ?

It could be both I think.
forever
 

Postunity100 »

what im referring to as 'facet's of a density are the two things - what you mainly do in this density as a result of what you learned from the last (current activity), and what you are learning during doing that activity - which is the actual lesson of the current density.

forever wrote:I am referring in this case to the properties of the rays not in a density-sense but in an entity-sense. And I am not referring to the activated ray obviously since that represents ray/light property to that density. I rather would like to explore at this point, the rays as they relate to an entity, not to the the density per se, although all this is intimately related, of course.


yes they are.
the thing is, in-density activity of energy centers/rays do not differ much from the general-density-emphasis concept.

take orange. what is it ? self needs, self development, maintenance, concept of self.

Its still there and it still functions in 3rd density. but it happens in the context of YELLOW ray this time - self needs in an environment with other entities (yellow ray), self development when inside a society (yellow ray), maintenance, concept of self inside a society.

So, lets put again the emotion anger: per the material, it is a property of red ray, at least in a 3rd density being with the current archetypical mind of this sub-logos --since we are limited to this sub-logos in many senses --and this will require another topic... But, is it because it prevents 'motion and change' ? ---properties of 1st density. The energy center is 'blocked' not allowing 'motion and change' to occur. Seems so, since if one is in an anger state, there is no room for anything else. For the energy to flow and allow other types of flowing to occur, for the mind to further manifest.


Anger is not the actual event that happens in the energy center, but an emotion that effects on the entity and causes clogging of the red ray center.

Therefore, here the entity is, in 3rd density, yellow ray energies flowing into his body from bottom, but all of them are clogged at red ray.

In the end, inflowing energy is what it is - ENERGY. it must be let out, spent, or used in some way. But, the yellow ray frequency energy (Which carries more energy than red) gets clogged and stuck at red.

There is unused energy.

And naturally the unused energy which goes unused turns into heat because it cannot find any means to manifest or anything to transform it. Afterwards comes its effects like cancer.

If this entity was a 1d entity, it wouldnt be a problem. since the energy coming to his own manifestation from the bottom would be red ray energy. All fine.

But the moment you start clogging lower energy centers in a higher density, you have a problem.

The mechanic is not the same for planet earth's quake troubles - there is clogging (the society being still orange, and leading to a blockage), there is unused energy, heat generates, and it leads to earthquakes as explained in ra material.

But then, is it venting this anger allowing the flow as blue ray expression or is it just an expression of the (always partial) blockage of the red center, using blue just a property of the density aspect, not the 'holographic nature' of the true blue ray in the entity ?


expressing the anger would naturally be blue ray.

ACTING on anger and discharging the clogged energies onto the person who is perceived as the cause of that anger, would just be aggression.

im at a loss to perceive what you mean as the 'holographic nature' of true blue ray in an entity.
unity100
 

Postforever »

expressing the anger would naturally be blue ray.

ACTING on anger and discharging the clogged energies onto the person who is perceived as the cause of that anger, would just be aggression.

im at a loss to perceive what you mean as the 'holographic nature' of true blue ray in an entity.

unity100



And expressing would take many forms, including exercise, singing, painting, writing a poem, talking about it

by 'holographic nature' I meant there are energy centers in the entity, outside the entity. Outside the entity are the general potentiation and activated rays. Inside of the entity we have also potentiated rays and activated mind (via archetypes) and body (yellow for 3rd) but we also reflect as entities the nature of those rays. I suppose it started after 'manyness' was established with the first central sun/'rest of infinity' separation.

These are thoughts. I am not sure about all this.
forever
 

Postunity100 »

forever wrote:
expressing the anger would naturally be blue ray.

ACTING on anger and discharging the clogged energies onto the person who is perceived as the cause of that anger, would just be aggression.

im at a loss to perceive what you mean as the 'holographic nature' of true blue ray in an entity.

unity100



And expressing would take many forms, including exercise, singing, painting, writing a poem, talking about it


even vocalization of the emotion of anger by telling the other person about that anger, while being consciously mindful that the emotion of anger is being expressed should have noticeable effect.

by 'holographic nature' I meant there are energy centers in the entity, outside the entity. Outside the entity are the general potentiation and activated rays. Inside of the entity we have also potentiated rays and activated mind (via archetypes) and body (yellow for 3rd) but we also reflect as entities the nature of those rays. I suppose it started after 'manyness' was established with the first central sun/'rest of infinity' separation.

These are thoughts. I am not sure about all this.


i dont think a concept like activated or not activated exists for mind.
unity100
 

Postforever »

i dont think a concept like activated or not activated exists for mind.


humm, maybe that is not the right word in this context. The archetypal mind for each density is present and at least for space/time, present in different forms according to each density. In the case of a 3rd density entity under this sublogos, the brain 'activates' or 'limits' what is to be perceived in general. Also acting in a less obvious way in the 3rd density time/space.

More limitations on a veiled 3d space/time. More archetypes in a veiled 3d: 22.
forever
 

Postunity100 »

forever wrote:
i dont think a concept like activated or not activated exists for mind.


humm, maybe that is not the right word in this context. The archetypal mind for each density is present and at least for space/time, present in different forms according to each density.


there arent different archetypal minds for different densities as far as i know. there is archetype of mind.

forever wrote:In the case of a 3rd density entity under this sublogos, the brain 'activates' or 'limits' what is to be perceived in general. Also acting in a less obvious way in the 3rd density time/space.

More limitations on a veiled 3d space/time. More archetypes in a veiled 3d: 22.


the limitation is introduced by two things - first should be the relative low vibration of a lower density like 3d naturally limiting capabilities of the significator. but, actually this is not a limitation - its a natural situation: a given density has its own vibrations and it can provide only as much as that vibration level allows.

2nd and major inhibitor is the veil put in between conscious and unconscious mind. this is only specific to 3d and seems to be only present in space/time. not in time/space.
unity100
 

Postforever »

there arent different archetypal minds for different densities as far as i know. there is archetype of mind.

lets see: yes, seems to be (main player) the sub-logos mind. 'there are different archetypes or in different numbers' for each density. The maximum seem to be 22 for 3d at least.

I wonder if there could be more or less archetypes in 4d and above.

Since 22 archetypes require a veil and in 4d and above there is no veil, seems reasonable that the archetypes are less in number and there is more 'freedom' relative to being bound by archetypal structures.
forever
 

Postunity100 »

forever wrote:
there arent different archetypal minds for different densities as far as i know. there is archetype of mind.

lets see: yes, seems to be (main player) the sub-logos mind. 'there are different archetypes or in different numbers' for each density. The maximum seem to be 22 for 3d at least.

I wonder if there could be more or less archetypes in 4d and above.

Since 22 archetypes require a veil and in 4d and above there is no veil, seems reasonable that the archetypes are less in number and there is more 'freedom' relative to being bound by archetypal structures.


can you link that quote from lawofone info please.
unity100
 

Next

Return to Practical Spirituality

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 1 guest